Washington, D.C. — Federal Reserve policymakers are increasingly weighing the potential impact of widespread artificial intelligence adoption on labor productivity as they formulate economic forecasts, acknowledging both its promise and profound uncertainty. Chair Jerome Powell highlighted this balance in December, noting that while past technological waves ultimately raised productivity and incomes, the outcome of the current AI shift remains to be seen.
Economists are modeling scenarios with significant implications. In research for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Professor Ping Wang and Fed economist Tsz-Nga Wong explored an "unbounded growth" scenario where AI becomes fully developed over decades. Their model suggests such a transformation could increase labor productivity by three to four times, but at the cost of displacing up to 23% of workers. For the nearer term, Wang projects a potential annual productivity boost of roughly 7%, though he cautions this remains a hypothetical outlook.
The potential for both a major productivity surge and significant labor displacement places the Fed at the center of a complex high-stakes economic transition. A sustained productivity jump could allow for stronger non-inflationary growth, influencing the path of interest rates. However, large-scale worker displacement would challenge the employment side of the Fed's dual mandate, requiring a delicate strategic policy pivot to balance price stability with maximum employment.
This uncertainty is reflected in the Fed's own projections. The Federal Open Market Committee's long-run federal funds rate estimate of 3% is seen by some, including Cleveland Fed economists, as moderately accommodative relative to a higher estimated neutral rate. The ultimate calibration will depend heavily on how, and how quickly, AI's theoretical benefits materialize in economic data.
The current frenzy of investment in AI infrastructure, particularly data centers, draws comparisons to the capital expenditure boom of the 1990s. Some investors, like Dan Tolomay of Trust Company of the South, express caution, noting that soaring valuations may temper future returns. This dynamic underscores that the AI revolution is unfolding within a familiar yet volatile competitive investment ecosystem, where anticipation often outpaces tangible economic impact.
For the Fed, the coming years will be a period of close observation and agile economic strategy, as it seeks to parse real-time data to distinguish between a transformative productivity revolution and a speculative bubble, with the health of the entire labor market in the balance.